Publisher verification reviews: current evidence profiles

Publisher due diligence

Publisher verification reviews: current evidence profiles

Current evidence-based publisher verification profiles, including Scientific Archives and SciTech Journals, reviewed August 6, 2026.

Maintained by the Beallslists.com editorial review team · Last updated: · Current verification cycle: 2026

Evidence-based review profiles · not automatic list entries

Why these profiles are separate from the historical list

Publisher names should not be added to a predatory-publisher list merely because they charge an APC, use broad marketing language, operate from a shared office address, or are absent from a particular index. A current review should identify verifiable facts, material inconsistencies, unresolved questions, and favorable evidence, then give the publisher a correction route.

The profiles below were prepared from publicly available pages checked on August 6, 2026. They do not make a final legal finding and should not be read as a substitute for title-level indexing checks or institutional advice.

How a publisher can request a correction

Send the exact disputed statement, the requested correction, and supporting documents through the correction and appeal page. Evidence may include official database records, company filings, archived policies, contracts, peer-review records, preservation agreements, or updated fee and licensing pages.

How to read a publisher review status